Educational

Sustainability Bonds: Bridging Environmental and Social Impact

A comprehensive introduction to bonds that combine green and social objectives

Jan 4, 2025 @ London

Sustainability bonds deliver dual impact by financing projects with both environmental and social benefits, offering issuers flexibility to address interconnected sustainability challenges through a single debt instrument.

What is a Sustainability Bond?

A sustainability bond is a fixed-income financial security that raises capital for projects delivering both environmental and social benefits. Like conventional bonds, sustainability bonds are issued by governments, multinational institutions, or corporations as debt instruments with regular interest payments and principal repayment at maturity. The distinguishing feature is their dedicated use of proceeds—sustainability bonds exclusively finance a combination of green and social projects, addressing multiple dimensions of sustainable development through a single financing instrument.

The definition of a sustainability bond has been formalised by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) in it Sustainability Bond Guidelines. According to ICMA, sustainability bonds are "any type of bond instrument where the proceeds or an equivalent amount will be exclusively applied to finance or re-finance a combination of both Green and Social Projects." These bonds align with the four core components of both the Green Bond Principles and Social Bond Principles, applying green principles to environmental aspects and social principles to social projects.

The Sustainability Bond Fundamentals

Building upon the foundation established by green bonds and social bonds, sustainability bonds maintain the same core framework while expanding its scope to encompass both environmental and social objectives.

Financial Structure

Sustainability bonds maintain the familiar financial characteristics of traditional bonds:

  • Fixed interest rates paid on a regular schedule
  • Predetermined maturity dates
  • Typically structured as senior unsecured debt (though secured structures exist)
  • Credit ratings based on the issuer's financial standing
  • Secondary market trading similar to conventional bonds

The key distinction lies not in their financial structure but in their broader sustainability mandate and the additional transparency requirements around how proceeds are used across environmental and social categories.

Core Framework Components

Following the established template of labelled bonds, sustainability bonds adhere to four essential elements:

  1. Dedicated Use of Proceeds: Funds must exclusively finance eligible environmental and social projects
  2. Project Evaluation and Selection: A transparent process must exist for determining project eligibility across both dimensions
  3. Segregated Proceeds Management: Bond proceeds must be tracked separately and allocated to designated sustainable projects
  4. Regular Reporting: Issuers must provide annual updates on proceeds allocation and both environmental and social impact

These components, formalised in the ICMA Sustainability Bond Guidelines, ensure that sustainability bonds maintain the same level of rigour and transparency as their green and social counterparts.

Self-Labelled Nature

Like other labelled bonds, sustainability bonds operate on a self-labelled basis. The issuer determines whether its bond qualifies as a "sustainability bond" based on alignment with accepted market standards. This flexibility allows issuers to tailor their approach while creating the need for:

  • External reviews from third-party verifiers to confirm alignment with principles
  • Clear articulation of dual-objective frameworks covering environmental and social categories
  • Enhanced scrutiny from investors regarding both types of impact credentials

This self-regulation approach continues to evolve as market expectations for rigour and credibility increase across the sustainable finance landscape.

The Evolution of Sustainability Bonds

Following the establishment of green bonds and then social bonds, sustainability bonds emerged as a natural evolution to bridge both objectives. The market has grown substantially:

  • From early pioneers primarily among multilateral development banks to diverse corporate and sovereign issuers
  • Expansion beyond financial institutions and utilities to include healthcare, telecommunications, and consumer goods companies
  • Growing alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as an integrated framework

This evolution reflects issuers' recognition that environmental and social challenges are often interconnected, requiring solutions that address multiple dimensions simultaneously.

Types of Sustainability Bonds

The market has developed various structural approaches to sustainability bonds, mirroring those established for green bonds:

  1. Standard Sustainability Use of Proceeds Bond: The most common structure, where proceeds finance sustainable projects while the bond remains a general obligation of the issuer
  2. Sustainability Revenue Bond: A non-recourse debt obligation where repayment comes from specific revenue streams, fees or taxes
  3. Sustainability Project Bond: Issued specifically for a single or multiple sustainable projects, with investors directly exposed to project risk
  4. Secured Sustainability Bond: A bond secured by specific assets, which may include the financed sustainable projects or other collateral

These variations provide flexibility for issuers with different needs and credit profiles while maintaining the core sustainability bond principles.

Eligible Project Categories

Sustainability bonds draw from both green and social eligible categories, enabling a wide range of sustainability-focused initiatives:

Environmental Categories

  • Renewable energy and energy efficiency
  • Clean transportation and sustainable water management
  • Pollution prevention and biodiversity conservation
  • Climate change adaptation and circular economy initiatives
  • Green buildings and sustainable land use

Social Categories

  • Affordable basic infrastructure (clean drinking water, sanitation, transport)
  • Access to essential services (healthcare, education, financial services)
  • Affordable housing and employment generation
  • Food security and socioeconomic advancement
  • Support for vulnerable populations and communities

This dual eligibility creates significant flexibility for issuers to address interconnected challenges through integrated projects and programmes.

The Sustainability Bond Guidelines

The ICMA Sustainability Bond Guidelines (SBG) serve as the primary market standard, confirming the applicability of both Green Bond Principles and Social Bond Principles to these dual-purpose instruments. The SBG framework emphasises:

  1. Use of Proceeds: Clear environmental and social benefits should be described in legal documentation, with project categories identified and quantified where possible
  2. Process for Project Evaluation and Selection: Issuers should outline sustainability objectives, project eligibility criteria, and risk assessment processes across both dimensions
  3. Management of Proceeds: Proceeds should be credited to sub-accounts or tracked through formal internal processes, with unallocated funds placed in temporary investments
  4. Reporting: Annual reporting on proceeds allocation and both environmental and social impact is expected until full allocation

These guidelines ensure consistency across the labelled bond market while acknowledging the distinctive dual-focus of sustainability bonds.

Impact and Importance of Sustainability Bonds

Environmental and Social Impact

Sustainability bonds mobilise capital for projects with tangible benefits across multiple dimensions:

  • Environmental outcomes such as reduced emissions, improved resource efficiency, and enhanced resilience
  • Social benefits including improved access to services, enhanced quality of life, and reduced inequality
  • Integrated solutions that recognise the interconnections between environmental and social challenges
  • Balance between immediate human needs and long-term environmental sustainability

The dual-impact reporting aspect of sustainability bonds provides quantifiable metrics that help investors understand the holistic outcomes of their investments.

Market Impact

Sustainability bonds have catalysed important developments in sustainable finance:

  • Encouraging integrated thinking about environmental and social sustainability
  • Creating frameworks for balanced reporting across multiple impact dimensions
  • Establishing the concept of intentional dual-impact investing in fixed income
  • Building investor capabilities for assessing both environmental and social criteria
  • Demonstrating market demand for broadly sustainable financial products

Benefits for Issuers

Organisations issue sustainability bonds for numerous strategic reasons:

  • Strategic flexibility: Ability to finance diverse projects under a single framework
  • Alignment with corporate strategy: Reflecting holistic sustainability approaches
  • Investor diversification: Attracting both environmentally and socially focused investors
  • Unified storytelling: Communicating integrated sustainability vision
  • Operational efficiency: Managing a single sustainability bond programme rather than separate green and social programmes
  • SDG alignment: Demonstrating contribution to multiple Sustainable Development Goals

Common Questions About Sustainability Bonds

What is the difference between a sustainability bond and a sustainable bond?

This is an important distinction in terminology. A "sustainability bond" specifically refers to a labelled bond instrument that follows the ICMA Sustainability Bond Guidelines, with proceeds dedicated to a combination of green and social projects. In contrast, "sustainable bond" is an umbrella term that can refer to any bond instrument designed to advance sustainability objectives, including green bonds, social bonds, sustainability bonds, and sustainability-linked bonds. All sustainability bonds are sustainable bonds, but not all sustainable bonds are sustainability bonds—just as all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.

What is the difference between a sustainability bond and a green bond?

While both follow similar structural principles with the same four core components, the key difference lies in the use of proceeds:

  • Green bonds exclusively finance environmental projects such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, clean transportation, or biodiversity conservation.
  • Sustainability bonds finance a combination of both environmental and social projects, addressing multiple dimensions of sustainability simultaneously.

A sustainability bond can finance the same environmental projects as a green bond, but also includes social categories like affordable housing, access to education, food security, or socioeconomic advancement. This broader mandate gives issuers more flexibility to address interconnected challenges through a single financing instrument.

Why issue a sustainability bond versus a green bond?

Issuers choose sustainability bonds over green bonds for several strategic reasons:

  1. Holistic sustainability strategy: For organisations with integrated environmental and social objectives, sustainability bonds better reflect their comprehensive approach.
  2. Project diversity: When an issuer has a mix of eligible projects across both environmental and social categories, a sustainability bond allows them to finance this diverse portfolio through a single instrument rather than separate green and social bonds.
  3. Expanding investor base: Sustainability bonds can attract investors focused on both environmental and social impact, potentially broadening the investor base beyond pure environmental funds.
  4. Alignment with SDGs: For issuers seeking to demonstrate contribution to multiple Sustainable Development Goals spanning both environmental and social dimensions, sustainability bonds provide a more coherent framework.
  5. Operational efficiency: Managing a single sustainability bond programme can be more efficient than maintaining separate green and social bond frameworks, especially for frequent issuers.
  6. Connection between environmental and social impacts: Many projects generate both types of benefits—for example, clean energy projects that also create jobs in disadvantaged communities. Sustainability bonds better capture this integrated impact.

The choice ultimately depends on the issuer's sustainability strategy, project pipeline, and communication objectives.

How do sustainability bonds compare to sustainability-linked bonds?

This represents a fundamental distinction in sustainable finance:

  • Sustainability bonds follow a use-of-proceeds model where funds are dedicated to specific eligible green and social projects. The focus is on what the money finances, with no change to the bond's financial characteristics based on performance.
  • Sustainability-linked bonds follow a general-purpose model where funds can be used for any purpose, but the bond's financial characteristics (typically the coupon rate) change based on whether the issuer achieves predefined sustainability performance targets. The focus is on the issuer's overall sustainability performance rather than specific project financing.

These approaches represent complementary rather than competing models, with some issuers utilizing both structures to address different aspects of their sustainability strategy.

Can a sustainability bond be more impactful than separate green and social bonds?

This depends on context and perspective. Sustainability bonds can potentially deliver greater impact through:

  • Addressing interconnected challenges more holistically
  • Encouraging integrated thinking about environmental and social sustainability
  • Focusing on projects with dual benefits that might fall between traditional categories
  • Simplifying the investment process for investors seeking both types of impact

However, separate green and social bonds might deliver more focused impact in their respective domains and could be more attractive to specialist investors. There is no inherent advantage to either approach—the impact depends on the specific projects financed and how effectively the issuer implements and reports on them.

The Future of Sustainability Bonds

The sustainability bond market continues to evolve in several important directions:

  • Enhanced integration with SDGs: More explicit alignment with specific Sustainable Development Goals and targets
  • Improved impact measurement: Development of more sophisticated methodologies for assessing and communicating combined environmental and social impacts
  • Sector-specific approaches: Tailored frameworks for industries facing unique sustainability challenges
  • Emerging market growth: Expansion in regions where integrated development challenges are most pressing
  • Digital innovation: Leveraging technology for more transparent tracking and reporting of multiple impact dimensions

As sustainable finance evolves, sustainability bonds will remain an important instrument for issuers seeking to address the complex, interconnected challenges of sustainable development through an integrated financing approach.

This article is the second in our series exploring the labelled bond universe. Read our first article on green bonds and watch for upcoming features on social bonds, transition bonds, and sustainability-linked bonds.

ClimateAligned provides comprehensive data and analytics across the sustainability bond universe, helping investors, issuers and analysts understand market trends, evaluate environmental and social impact, and make informed allocation decisions.

Start here to get access to high-quality, customisable sustainability data in the financial markets.